Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical Committee for Human Rights
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snow Keep (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 20:06, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Medical Committee for Human Rights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Clearly promotional, largely unsourced copy Holypod (talk) 02:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - It was an influential and notable group. Martin Luther King Jr. personally addressed their convention in 1966. The group has been mentioned by reputable journals such as this one, and I've done a bit of editing of the article myself to add details. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep for precisely the reasons User:CoffeeWithMarkets articulates, with thanks to User:CoffeeWithMarkets for improving sourcing on this small but significant (it's not like medical care was available to civil rights protestors in Southern cities, this outfit stepped in) organization that was a significant part of the Civil Rights Movement back in the day. User:Holypod came upon a brief and under-sourced article, and assumed that it was "promotional", but might now withdraw - or any editor coming to the page can simply close it. There is no valid argument for deletion.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep With the improvements and sourcing additions made by CoffeeWithMarkets, now a WP:GNG pass.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 19:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per CoffeeWIthMarkets and their improvements, and the fact WP:PROMO never applies to defunct organizations because what is there to promote? If you're going to nominate here, know basic guidelines and have common sense, please. Nate • (chatter) 02:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep -- This sounds like a significant participant in the civil rights movement of the 1960s and 1970s. Since it is now defunct (and has been for about 30 years), it is hardly promotional, since there is nothing existing to promote. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.